AG Opinions

Attorney General
Opinions

Consumer Complaints

File a
Complaint

Training Icon

Events and
Training

Request a Speaker Icon

Request a
Speaker

Robocall Icon

Robocall
Reporting Form

Common Senior Scams

Common Senior
Scams

Lemon Icon

Lemon
Laws

Information

Press
Releases

AG Opinions

Attorney General
Opinions

Consumer Complaints

File a
Complaint

Training Icon

Events and
Training

Request a Speaker Icon

Request a
Speaker

Robocall Icon

Robocall
Reporting Form

Common Senior Scams

Common Senior
Scams

Lemon Icon

Lemon
Laws

Information

Press
Releases

Latest from

X white large logo

Press Releases

Monday, May 11, 2026

More Than 400 Register for Attorney General Griffin’s Emerging Issues Series Event Exploring AI and the Law

Read More >

AG Seal

Friday, May 08, 2026

Attorney General Griffin Continues Fight against Shipment of Abortion Pills into Arkansas, Joins Amici Briefs Challenging FDA Rule

Read More >

AG Seal

Friday, May 08, 2026

Attorney General Griffin Announces Conviction of Cabot Man for Possession of Child Sexual Abuse Materials

Read More >

Attorney General Opinions

2026-045
Mr. Brandon Henry
2026-05-18

Question: Is the custodian’s decision to release the requested record with redactions consistent with the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)?

Brief Response: In my opinion, the custodian has correctly classified the disciplinary action form as an employee-evaluation record. And because the four-part test for release of employee-evaluation records appears to be met, the custodian’s decision to release the record is also consistent with the FOIA.

https://opinionstorage.blob.core.windows.net/opinions/2026-045.pdf?sv=2024-11-04&spr=https&st=2025-11-10T16%3A56%3A20Z&se=2033-01-02T01%3A11%3A20Z&sr=c&sp=racwdl&sig=f4DaaI85zQD1LrafTHkslBvUPZhTHLXbHbLjhM45yLg%3D
2026-044
Captain Mike Blain
2026-05-15

Question: Is the custodian’s decision to release the requested records with redactions consistent with the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)?

Brief Response: The custodian’s decision to release the records as redacted is partially consistent with the FOIA. To the extent that certain records contain public employee personnel numbers, those numbers must be redacted. Commendation, promotion, and suspension letters issued by the employee’s supervisor should be withheld as “employee-evaluation and job-performance records.” Whether the custodian’s maintenance of records within a “personnel file” complies with an internal workplace records-retention policy is outside the scope of my review under A.C.A. § 25-19-105(c). The custodian must determine whether such records are “public records.” If so, they are subject to release unless there is an applicable exemption—which includes the “personnel records” exemption and the “employee-evaluation and job-performance records” exemption discussed in the opinion.

https://opinionstorage.blob.core.windows.net/opinions/2026-044.pdf?sv=2024-11-04&spr=https&st=2025-11-10T16%3A56%3A20Z&se=2033-01-02T01%3A11%3A20Z&sr=c&sp=racwdl&sig=f4DaaI85zQD1LrafTHkslBvUPZhTHLXbHbLjhM45yLg%3D
2026-043
Major Greg Evans
2026-05-14

Question: Is the custodian’s decision to release the requested records with redactions consistent with the Arkansas Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)?

Brief Response: The custodian’s decision is partially consistent with the FOIA. The custodian may properly release the unsolicited letters of commendation and appreciation from third parties and the administrative records, subject to redactions. But the custodian should withhold from release the employee performance evaluations, the final investigation letter, the commendation letters made by or at the behest of the employer, the promotion letters, and the December 7, 2007 demotion letter. These records are properly classified as employee-evaluation or job-performance records, and the test for their release appears not to have been met. If, however, the custodian determines that the test for release has been met for any of these records, then they should be disclosed. Finally, the manner—as opposed to the substance—of the redactions is inconsistent with the FOIA.

https://opinionstorage.blob.core.windows.net/opinions/2026-043.pdf?sv=2024-11-04&spr=https&st=2025-11-10T16%3A56%3A20Z&se=2033-01-02T01%3A11%3A20Z&sr=c&sp=racwdl&sig=f4DaaI85zQD1LrafTHkslBvUPZhTHLXbHbLjhM45yLg%3D

Our Divisions

Civil

Civil
Litigation